Green Innovation as a Mediator between CSR, Ownership Concentration, and Financial Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.17.3.293-315Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Innovation, Financial Performance, Ownership Concentration, SustainabilityAbstract
This study examines the mediating role of green innovation in the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Ownership Concentration (OC), and Financial Performance (FP) in the energy and basic materials sector in Indonesia. Data from 20 companies from 2020 to 2023 were analyzed using panel data regression and Sobel test. The findings show that CSR positively affects GI but has no significant direct effect on FP. Meanwhile, OC has no significant effect on GI and a negative effect on FP. Additionally, GI negatively affects financial performance but mediates the positive relationship between CSR and FP. However, GI does not significantly mediate the relationship between OC and FP. These results highlight the importance of aligning sustainable practices with a company's long-term strategy to enhance company value. This research contributes to understanding the dynamic interaction between CSR, governance structure, and innovation in achieving sustainability and profitability goals.
References
Agustin, E. P., & Widiatmoko, J. (2022). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Kualitas Audit terhadap Manajemen Laba. Owner, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.707
Ahdiat, A. (2023, September 18). 44% Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Indonesia Berasal dari Sektor Energi pada 2020. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/09/18/44-emisi-gas-rumah-kaca-indonesia-berasal-dari-sektor-energi-pada-2020
Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500
Ait Sidhoum, A., & Serra, T. (2018). Corporate Sustainable Development. Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions. Sustainable Development, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1711
Alimehmeti, G., & Paletta, A. (2009). Ownership Concentration and Effects Over Firm Performance : Evidences From Italy. European Scientific Journal, 8(22).
Asni, N., & Agustia, D. (2022). Does corporate governance induce green innovation? An emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 22(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2021-0389
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I., & Licata, G. La. (2022). Environmental reputational risk, negative media attention and financial performance. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12163
Bing, T., & Li, M. (2019). Does CSR signal the firm value? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154255
Bonsu, M. O. A., Guo, Y., & Zhu, X. (2024). Does green innovation mediate corporate social responsibility and environmental performance? Empirical evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2022-0271
Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101
Dai, X., Siddik, A. B., & Tian, H. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Finance and Environmental Performance: Does Green Innovation Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013607
Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Sociological Perspectives, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
Fan, S., Chen, J., & Han, H. (2023). Ownership concentration and accounting information consistency—evidence from Chinese listed companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2022-0012
Fernando, Y., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
Hao, J., & He, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and green innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102889
Hashmi, M. A., Istaqlal, U., & Brahmana, R. K. (2023). Corporate governance and cost of equity: the moderating role of ownership concentration levels. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-01-2021-0019
Hong, M., Drakeford, B., & Zhang, K. (2020). The impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on green innovation: evidence from China. Green Finance, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2020017
Hou, T. C. T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1647
Husnaini, W., & Tjahjadi, B. (2021). Quality management, green innovation and firm value: Evidence from indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10282
Indrarini, Si. (2019). Nilai Perusahaan Melalui Kualitas Laba:(Good Governance dan Kebijakan Perusahaan). In Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Iqbal, T. (2019). Impact of Quality Management on Green Innovation: A Case of Pakistani Manufacturing Companies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22964-1_18
Javeed, S. A., Zhou, N., Cai, X., & Latief, R. (2022). How does corporate management affect green innovation via business environmental strategies? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1059842
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research 4th Edition. Journal of Social Development, 13(2).
Khuong, N. V., & Anh, L. H. T. (2023). The nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm value: the moderating role of life-cycle stages. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0370
Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262
Larrain, B., Roosenboom, P., Sertsios, G., & Urzúa, F. (2023). Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: New Evidence from Owner Stakes in IPOs. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01039
LESTARI, N. L. P. R. W., & NARINDRA, A. A. N. M. (2022). The Influence Of Environmental Performance And Good Corporate Governance On Company Value. Journal of Tourism Economics and Policy, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v2i2.338
Liu, Z., Ma, Z., Wu, M., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Empirical Analysis of Factors of Company Value Based on Hermes. BCP Business & Management, 38. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3889
Ma, C., Chishti, M. F., Durrani, M. K., Bashir, R., Safdar, S., & Hussain, R. T. (2023). The Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Financial Performance: A Case of Developing Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043724
Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.038
Mbate, M. M., & Sutrisno. (2023). Effects of CEO Duality, Board Independence, Ownership Concentration, Company Age on Profit Persistence and Firm Value: An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies in West Java, Indonesia. The ES Accounting And Finance, 1(02). https://doi.org/10.58812/esaf.v1i02.62
Musah, A., Padi, A., Okyere, B., E. Adenutsi, D., & Ayariga, C. (2022). Does corporate governance moderate the relationship between internal control system effectiveness and SMEs financial performance in Ghana? Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152159
Ndua, D. N., Nyamute, W., Kithinji, A., & Njihia, J. (2023). Ownership Concentration, Capital Structure and Stock Returns of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.3.1981
Papagiannakis, G., Voudouris, I., Lioukas, S., & Kassinis, G. (2019). Environmental management systems and environmental product innovation: The role of stakeholder engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2293
Parkinson, J. (1994). The Legal Context of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.1994.tb00056.x
Pérez-Calderón, E., Pache-Durán, M., & Milanés-Montero, P. (2021). Inversión ecoeficiente: efectos sobre el desempeño económico y financiero de los grupos empresariales del Dow Jones Sustainability World Index. Revista de Contabilidad, 24(2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.403061
Purbawangsa, I. B. A., Solimun, S., Fernandes, A. A. R., & Mangesti Rahayu, S. (2020). Corporate governance, corporate profitability toward corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate value (comparative study in Indonesia, China and India stock exchange in 2013-2016). Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2017-0160
Rahman, Md. J., & Fang, Y. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm performance in China. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv9i4p4
Rodríguez-Valencia, L., & Lamothe Fernández, P. (2023). Managerial concentration, ownership concentration, and firm value: Evidence from Spanish SMEs. Small Business International Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v7i1.541
Saputro, J. A., & Indraswono, C. (2022). Do you know Company Value? It’s Depend on Accounting Disclosure and Performance Environment: Evidence from Indonesian Country. KINERJA, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v26i2.5765
Shahriar, A., Mehzabin, S., & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). Impact of Country-Level Governance and Ownership Concentration on Firm Value in Central Europe. Central European Management Journal, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.79
Suganthi, L. (2020). Sustainability indices for energy utilization using a multi-criteria decision model. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00249-2
Suryanto, A., & Refianto. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Bina Manajemen, 8(1).
Taliento, M., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2019). Impact of environmental, social, and governance information on economic performance: Evidence of a corporate “sustainability advantage” from Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061738
Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., Yuliana, R., Prasetyono, P., Syarif, M., Alkirom Wildan, M., & Syam Kusufi, M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, financial fraud, and firm’s value in Indonesia and Malaysia. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11907
Utomo, M. N., Wahyudi, S., Muharam, H., & Helmina, M. R. A. (2019). Linking ownership concentration to firm value: Mediation role of environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v10.1(33).18
Wirawan, A. W., Falah, L. J., Kusumadewi, L., Adhariani, D., & Djakman, C. D. (2020). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Firm Value with Risk Management as a Moderating Variable. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2020.1745051
Wu, H., & Hu, S. (2020). The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122682
Wu, H., Xia, S., Long, X., Chen, J., Li, C., & Hao, Y. (2024). Innovation under environmental constraints: Does corporate environmental responsibility matter in green innovation? Journal of Information Economics, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.58567/jie01040005
Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
Xie, Z., Wang, J., & Zhao, G. (2022). Impact of Green Innovation on Firm Value: Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s Heavy Pollution Industries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.806926
Yao, Q., Liu, J., Sheng, S., & Fang, H. (2019). Does eco-innovation lift firm value? The contingent role of institutions in emerging markets. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2018-0201
Yuniarti, R., Soewarno, N., & Isnalita. (2022). GREEN INNOVATION ON FIRM VALUE WITH FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AS MEDIATING VARIABLE: EVIDENCE OF THE MINING INDUSTRY. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2022.27.2.3
Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866
Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Chen, Y. (2019). Local religious norms, corporate social responsibility, and firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.015
Zulkarnain, I., Riyanti, Ali, S., & Angelina, E. (2023). IMPACT OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP CONTROL AGAINST COMPANY VALUE. PENANOMICS: International Journal of Economics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56107/penanomics.v2i1.97
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vinda Auralia Kesuma Dewi, Imam Hadiwibowo, Mohammad Taufik Azis (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
