Political Connection and BPD Performance

Authors

  • Joy Elly Tulung Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Bahu, Malalayang, Manado City, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Dendi Ramdani Bank Mandiri, Plaza Mandiri 18th Floor, Jl.Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav 36 -38. Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia, 12190

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.3.289-298

Keywords:

Political Connection, BPD, Government

Abstract

The political situation that stable and conducive simplify business activities of a company politics and vice versa can be facilitated by the existence of good business. The relationship is what eventually called a political connection. Business relationship with politics has a very close relationship to harmony of an economy. The sample in this study is board members in 26 BPD during the year 2010 to 2014. We use political connected as an independent variable, the political connected is the board are coming from government, BPD is owned by government so the board with government background is identified as a political connected. The dependent variables are return on asset, return on equity and non-performing loan. This study uses firm size as a control variable. This study is expected to give a contribution to the topics of political connection and give a recommendation to government how to choice the member of board.

References

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996) ‘Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders’, Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis, 31 (3), 377–397.

Bertrand, Marianne, Antoinette Schoar, and David Thesmar. (2007) ‘Banking Deregulation and Industry Structure: Evidence from the French Banking Reforms of 1985’, Journal of Finance, 62 (2), 597–628.

Chaney, P.K., Faccio, M., Parsley, D., (2011)’The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61, 58-76.

Chen, L., Zeng, J., Xu, D., Zhao, Z., & Guo, J.. (2010) ‘Macronutrient Deficiency Symptoms In Betula Alnoides Seedlings’, Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 22(4), 403–413.

El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C.Y. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra (2011). ‘Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?’, Journal of Banking & Finance 35: 2388-2406.

Faccio, M. (2010) ’Differences between Politically Connected and Non connected Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis’, Financial Management, 39: 905–928

Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W. And Mcconnell, J. J. (2006) ‘Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts’, The Journal of Finance, 61: 2597–2635.

Fama, E. F.. (1978) ‘The Effects of a Firm's Investment and Financing Decisions on the Welfare of Its Security Holders’, The American Economic Review, 68(3), 272–284.

Fisman, Raymond. (2001) ’Estimating the Value of Political Connections’, American Economic Review 91, 4: 1095-1 102.

Friedman, J.H. (2002) ‘Stochastic Gradient Boosting’, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 38(4):367-378.

Goldman, C., E. Stuart, I. Hoffman, M. Fuller and M. Billingsley (2011) ‘Interactions between Energy Efficiency programs funded under the Recovery Act and Utility-customer funded’, Energy Efficiency Programs, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: LBNL-4322E, March.

Gomez, E. T., and K.S. Jomo. (1997). Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits, First Edition (Cambridge University Press).

Guedhami, O., and Pittman, J. (2006). Ownership Concentration in Privatized Firms: The Role of Disclosure Standards, Auditor Choice, and Auditing Infrastructure, Journal of Accounting Research 44, 889-929.

Gul, F. A. (2006). Auditors' Response to Political Connections and Cronyism in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting Research, 44: 931–963

Iswandi. (1998). Bisnis Militer Orde Baru. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-350.

Jogiyanto, HM. (2009). Analisis dan Desain. Yogyakarta : Andi OFFSET

Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia, Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), p. 411-439.

Liddle, W., R. (1997). Coercion, Co-optation, and the Management of Ethnic Relations in Indonesia, in Michael E. Brown and Sumit Ganguly, eds., Government Policies and Ethnic Relations in Asia and the Pacific, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1997, pp. 274-319.

Mobarak, A. and Purbasari, D., P. (2006). Corrupt protection for sale to firms: Evidence from Indonesia, Yale University, mimeograph

Qian, W., Burritt, R. and Monroe, G. (2011). Environmental management accounting in local government: A case of waste management, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 93-128.

Sharpe, A., Sharp, B., & Redford, N. (2003). Positioning & Partitioning – A Replication & Extension. ANZMAC Proceeding p.2546-2552

Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Vroom, V H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York. Wiley. Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh. PAJ

Yoshihara, K. (1988). The Rise of Ersatz Capitalism in South-East Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press

Other sources:

Ridep Institute, Practices of Military Business, citing statistics from the planning bureau of the Ministry of Cooperatives, Small and Medium Enterprises, 2001

Tempo Magazine

Acts No. 2/2011

Downloads

Submitted

08/05/2024

Published

08/22/2024

How to Cite

Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2024). Political Connection and BPD Performance. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 16(3), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.3.289-298

How to Cite

Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2024). Political Connection and BPD Performance. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 16(3), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.3.289-298