Boosting University Efficiency via Balanced Scorecard from a Financial and Internal Viewpoints

Authors

  • Muhammad Taufiq Abadi State Islamic University KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan Indonesia Jalan Pahlawan Rowolaku Kajen 51161
  • Ayatullah Sadali State Islamic University KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan Indonesia Jalan Pahlawan Rowolaku Kajen 51161
  • Muhammad Akbar Fadzkurrahman A. University Of Sheffield Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.17.1.53-67

Keywords:

Performance, Balanced Scorecard, Finance, Internal Business

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the performance of the KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan State Islamic University (UIN) using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) method which focuses on two perspectives: finance and internal business. The research method used is descriptive with a quantitative approach. Data was collected through surveys, interviews, and analysis of financial documents and internal university performance reports. Financial performance indicators include income, expenses and cost efficiency, while internal business indicators include academic processes, operational efficiency and service quality. The research results show that from a financial perspective, universities experienced a significant increase in annual income, especially from PNBP and academic support. However, there is still a need to diversify income sources. The largest expenditures are allocated to academic activities, staff salaries and allowances, and despite savings efforts, cost efficiency can still be improved. From an internal business perspective, the quality of the academic process is considered good but requires curriculum innovation that is more responsive to job market needs. Campus operational efficiency is good, but several administrative processes require digitalization. The level of student and staff satisfaction with university services is quite high, although there are areas that need improvement such as IT services and supporting facilities. This research concludes that the performance of UIN KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan from a financial and internal business perspective is quite good, but there are areas that require improvement to achieve higher efficiency and effectiveness. Key recommendations include diversifying revenue sources, increasing expenditure efficiency, curriculum innovation, and digitizing administrative processes.

References

Al-Tarawneh, H. A., & Mubaslat, M. M. (2011). The Impact of Implementing Balanced Scorecard on the Organizational Performance: An Analytical Study in Jordanian Industrial Companies". International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(12), 177–185.

Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2018). Public Sector Reform in Dutch Universities: Identifying Leadership Profiles for Organizational Change". Tertiary Education and Management, 24(3), 215–228.

Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2020). University Autonomy and Quality Management: The Ambiguous Role of the University Governing Board. Higher Education, 79(3), 547–564.

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. In The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183

Grima, S., Grech, A., & Wain, D. (2018). Efficiency and Cost Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of a European University". International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 108–122.

Johnstone, D. B. (2020). Financing Higher Education: Worldwide Perspectives and Policy Options". Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(3), 223–241.

Jongbloed, B. (2015). University Funding and Student Financial Aid: Policies and Trends in Western Europe". Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 692–716.

Kim, M., Bastedo, M. N., & Chong, P. (2019). Accountability in Higher Education: The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Budgeting. Higher Education Management and Policy, 31(2), 123–140.

Maassen, P., & Cloete, N. (2019). Governance and Management Reforms in Higher Education: Global and Local Perspectives. Higher Education Policy, 32(3), 371–388.

Philpott, K., Dooley, L., Oreilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003

Tight, M. (2021). Globalization and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633560

Zhang, L., & Thomas, S. L. (2016). Financial Management and Efficiency in Higher Education: Empirical Evidence from the U.S. Journal of Higher Education Finance, 43(1), 41–62.

Downloads

Submitted

08/16/2024

Accepted

09/24/2024

Published

09/28/2024

How to Cite

Abadi, M. T., Sadali, A., & Fadzkurrahman A, M. A. . (2024). Boosting University Efficiency via Balanced Scorecard from a Financial and Internal Viewpoints. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 17(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.17.1.53-67

How to Cite

Abadi, M. T., Sadali, A., & Fadzkurrahman A, M. A. . (2024). Boosting University Efficiency via Balanced Scorecard from a Financial and Internal Viewpoints. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 17(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.17.1.53-67