How Knowledge Sharing Mediates the Effect of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Commitment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.17.2.171-184Keywords:
organizational commitment, , Knowledge Sharing, , Authentic LeadershipAbstract
This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the effect of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Commitment which is mediated by Knowledge Sharing. This research is causality associative research using a quantitative approach. The scope of this research includes the subject of the research, namely permanent employees and contract employees at PT. Karya Pak Oles Tokcer who work in Bali Province. The population in this study were all employees of PT Karya Pak Oles Tokcer in Bali Province with a total of 117 employees. The sampling technique used in this study was saturated sampling which is included in non-probability sampling. The data analysis technique in this study uses two analysis techniques, namely descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results of the analysis provide evidence that Authentic Leadership has a positive effect on Organizational Commitment and Authentic Leadership affects Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge Sharing also has a positive effect on Organizational Commitment and mediates Authentic Leadership on Organizational Commitment.
References
Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 98–106.
Ahmed, S., Kanwal, S., & Lodhi, R. N. (2020). Leadership Enhances Affective Organizational Commitment and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Comparative Study of Gender Disparity. The Journal of Educational Paradigms, Vol. 02(01) 80-87.
Allen, N. J and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology. Vol 63 (1), pp. 1-18.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
Bandura, C. T., & Kavussanu, M. (2018). Authentic leadership in sport: Its relationship with athletes’ enjoyment and commitment and the mediating role of autonomy and trust. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 13(6), 968-977.
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.
Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2012). Motivation and leader-member exchange: Evidence counter to similarity attraction theory. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1), 18-28.
Barker, Chris. (2008). Cultural Stydies Teori & Praktik. Yogyakarta. Kreasi Wacana.
Baron, R.A. dan Byrne, D. (2005). Psikologi sosial. Edisi kesepuluh: jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chaudhary, R., & Panda, C. (2018). Authentic leadership and creativity: The intervening role of psychological meaningfulness, safety and work engagement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 2071-2088.
Cheah, C. S., Chong, V. S. W., Yeo, S. F., & Pee, K. W. (2016). An empirical study on factors affecting organizational commitment among generation X. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 167-174.
Curado, C., & Vieira, S. (2019). Trust, knowledge sharing and organizational commitment in SMEs. Personnel Review, 48(6), 1449-1468.
Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243-256.
Datta, B. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of authentic leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 62-75.
Dasi, A., Pedersen, T., Gooderham, P. N., Elter, F., Hildrum, J. (2017). The effect of organizational separation on individuals’ knowledge sharing in MNCs. Journal of World Business, 52(3):431–446.
Edi, M. (2023). Pengaruh Berbagi Pengetahuan, Pertukaran Pemimpin-Anggota, Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Dosen Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Pada Dosen Akademi Teknik Pika Semarang). Innovation, Theory & Practice Management Journal, 2(2), 68-106.
Edú-Valsania, S., Moriano, J. A., & Molero, F. (2016). Authentic leadership and employee knowledge sharing behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(4), 487–506.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis La-Mastro, V. (1990). Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1): 51-59.
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29: 459–478.
Ellemers, N., Maloku, E., Derks, B., Van Laar, C. (2019). Stimulating Interethnic Contact in Kosovo: The Role of Social Identity Complexity and Distinctiveness Threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(7): 1039-1058.
Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140.
Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of educational research, 63(4), 489-525.
Gatling, A., Kang, H. J. A., & Kim, J. S. (2016). The effects of authentic leadership and organizational commitment on turnover intention. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 37(2), 181-199.
Gill, C., & Caza, A. (2015). An investigation of authentic leadership’s individual and group influences on follower responses. Journal of Management, 44(2), 530-554.
Giustiniano, L., Lombardi, S., Cavaliere, V. (2016). How knowledge collecting fosters organizational creativity. Management Decision, 54 (6):1464-1496.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), 2 nd edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Helmi, A. F., Elita, Y. (2013). Efikasi Diri, Sistem Imbalan, dan Berbagi Pengetahuan: Meta-analisis. Buletin Psikologi, 21(1):41.
Hlongwane, V. and Olivier, B. (2017), “Authentic leadership influences on organizational commitment in a South African state hospital”, Journal of Psychology in Africa, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 400-404.
Hoch, J.E., Bommer, W.H., Dulebohn, J.H. and Wu, D. (2018), “Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership?: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 501-529
Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23:338-342.
Hogg, M.A., Vaughan, G. M. (2017). Social Psychology. Germany: Pearson.
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. Springer International Publishing. (pp. 3-17).
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
Jackson, J. W., Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing Social Identity: A New Framework and Evidence for The Impact of Different Dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1): 120-135.
Javaid, M., Abdullah, N. H., Zeb, A., & Hussain, K. (2018). The impact of authentic leadership on knowledge sharing behavior with the moderating role of Islamic work ethics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1049, No. 1, p. 012007). IOP Publishing.
Jenkins, Richard. (2008). Social Identity. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Joseph, A. I. Ng. (2021). The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on Authentic Leadership and Organizational Commitment among Catholic Higher Education Institutions in Batangas. The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on Authentic Leadership and Organizational Commitment among Catholic Higher Education Institutions in Batangas, 77(1), 14-14.
Judge, T. A., & Robbins, S. P. (2017). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
Khan, J., Khan, S., & Rasheed, F. (2019). Authentic leadership, employee wellbeing and employee creativity: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Market Forces, 14(2), 21-35.
Kenku, A. A., Olabimitan, B. A., & Ishola, A. A. (2022). Task orientation, knowledge sharing, organizational justice, and organizational commitment among bank employees: Evidence from Nigeria. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 5(2), 79-89.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological inquiry, 14(1), 1-26.
Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and innovation management, 21(2), 147-157.
Kim, H. D., & Cruz, A. B. (2016). The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(6), 900-909.
Lakshman, C., Rai, S., & Lakshman, S. (2022). Knowledge sharing, organizational commitment and turnover intention among knowledge workers: a knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(5), 768-785.
Lee, T. W., Ashford, S. J., Walsh, J. P., & Mowday, R. T. (1992). Commitment propensity, organizational commitment, and voluntary turnover: A longitudinal study of organizational entry processes. Journal of management, 18(1), 15-32.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. Positive organizational scholarship, 241, 258.
Majeed, N., Chandni, K., Jamshed, S., & Moosa, K. (2020). Authentic Leadership in Determining Employee’s Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Virtuousness. Academic Journal of Social Sciences (AJSS), 4(4), 815-834.
May, D. R., Chan, A. Y., Hodges, T. D., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational dynamics.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
Nasab, A. H., & Afshari, L. (2019). Authentic leadership and employee performance: mediating role of organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5): 548-560.
Nelke, M., Håkansson, C. (2015). Competitive intelligence for information professionals. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.
Nam Nguyen, H., & Mohamed, S. (2011). Leadership behaviors, organizational culture and knowledge management practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of management development, 30(2), 206-221.
Nguyen, T., Nguyen, K., Do, T. (2019). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(4): 619-634.
Pahi, M. H., Abdul-Majid, A. H., Fahd, S., Gilal, A. R., Talpur, B. A., Waqas, A., & Anwar, T. (2022). Leadership Style and Employees' Commitment to Service Quality: An Analysis of the Mediation Pathway via Knowledge Sharing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Rahyuda, K. (2020). Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Based of The Research Pyramid. Denpasar : Udayana Press.
Rego, A., Vitória, A., Magalhães, A., Ribeiro, N., & e Cunha, M. P. (2013). Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams?. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 61-79.
Ribeiro, N., Duarte, P., & Fidalgo, J. (2020). Authentic leadership’s effect on customer orientation and turnover intention among Portuguese hospitality employees: the mediating role of affective commitment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2097-2116.
Riley, A., Burke, P. J. (1995). Identities and Self-Verificatioin the Small Group. Social Psychology Quarterly,58:61-73.
Robbins, P, Stephen. Judge, A, Timothy. (2012). Organizational Behavior, 14th edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Roncesvalles, M., Celia, T., & Gaerlan, A. A. (2021). The Role of Authentic Leadership and Teachers' Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 9(2), 92-121.
Salleh, S. M., Ismail, S. N., Hamzah, S. F. M., Zahari, A. S. M., Mohammed, N. H., & Abdullah, N. (2017). Knowledge sharing and organizational commitment in organization. Journal of Applied Environmental Bio-Sciences, 7(58), 37-40.
Semedo, A.S., Coelho, A. and Ribeiro, N. (2019), “Authentic leadership, happiness at work and affective commitment: an empirical study in Cape Verde”, European Business Review, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 337-351.
Sharif, S., Lodhi, R. N., Munir, M. A., & Yasmin, F. (2021). Authentic leadership and knowledge management in public libraries: role of organizational commitment using mixed method research. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-26.
Smith, R., Bhindi, N., Hansen, J., Riley, D., & Rall, J. (2009). Questioning the notion of'authentic'leadership in education: The perspectives of'followers'. In AARE 2008 International Education Research Conference Proceedings. AARE: Australian Association for Research in vacation.
Sintaasih, D. K., Dewi, I. M., Utama, I. W. M., & Mujiati, N. W. (2019). Work Spirituality: Its effect to the organizational commitment and performance of rural credit institution administrator. International Journal of Ethics and Systems.
Stangor, C. (2016). The study of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination within social psychology: A quick history of theory and research. In: Nelson, T.D., editor. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and Discrimination. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of Organizational Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Stets, J. E., Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 63(3): 224-237.
Stoermer, S., Davies, S., Froese, F. J. (2021). The Influence of Expatriate Cultural Intelligence on Organizational Embeddedness and Knowledge Sharing: The Moderating Effects of Host Country Context. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(3): 432-453.
Sugiyono, D. (2019). Metode penelitian kuatintatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. pp. 159-175.
Swift, P. E., & Hwang, A. (2013). The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 20-37.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social Identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13:65-93.
Tajfel,H. (1978). Differentiation between Social Groups. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Jost, J. T., Sidanius, J. Political psychology: Key readings. East Sussex: Psychology Press. pp. 276–293.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Worchel, S., Austin, W. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall. pp. 7–24.
Tobing, Paul L. (2011). Manajemen Knowledge Sharing Berbasis Komunitas. Bandung: Graha Ilmu.
Tolentino, R. C. (2013). Organizational commitment and job performance of the academic and administrative personnel. International journal of Information technology and Business Management, 15(1), 51-59.
Tran, H. P. (2019). How authentic leadership promotes individual knowledge sharing: viewing from the lens of COR theory. Management & Marketing, 14(4), 387-401.
Van Den Hoof, B., De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6): 117-130.
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Crisp, R. J., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., Gaertner, S. L. (2015). Imagined intergroup contact and common ingroup identity: An integrative approach. Social Psychology, 46: 265–276.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 34(1), 89-126.
Wuryanti, W., Setiawan, I. (2017). A model for improving human resource performance in the context of knowledge donating. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 8(2):208-215.
Zeb, A., Abdullah, N. H., Hussain, A., & Safi, A. (2020). Authentic leadership, knowledge sharing, and employees’ creativity. Management Research Review. 43(6), 669-690.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Gede Tito Dana Perkasa, Agoes Ganesha Rahyuda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
