ESG Performance and Firm Value – Do Busy Directors Help?

Authors

  • Sondang Zenita Sabatini Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok 16424
  • Cynthia A. Utama Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok 16424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.2.151-162

Keywords:

ESG performance, firm value, company value, busy directors

Abstract

ESG is an important issue companies encounter when conducting business. The implementation of ESG with good performance will lead the company to be more prosperous and attractive to investors. This study examines how busy directors affect the increase in the value of companies that have good ESG performance within a sample of 41 public companies in Indonesia during the years 2017-2021. Data were obtained from Thomson Reuters and the companies’ annual reports. By using ESG score as a proxy for ESG performance variables and the percentage of busy directors’ presence in public companies, we can determine their influence on firm value. Panel data regression in e-views shows a positive and significant influence between ESG performance and firm value, and there is no significant effect between busy directors and firm value. Furthermore, we also find that the influence of busy directors as 
a moderator weakened the positive impact of ESG performance on firm value.

References

Afriani Utama, C., & Utama, S. (2019). Board of Commissioners in Corporate Governance, Firm Performance, and Ownership

Structure. In International Research Journal of Business Studies (Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 111–136). https://doi.org/10.21632/

irjbs.12.2.111-136

Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt.pdf. Energy Economics, 112(2022).

Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. In Borsa Istanbul

Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

Ben Fatma, H., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Corporate governance and firm value: a study on European financial institutions. In

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2021-0306

Cashman, G. D., Gillan, S. L., & Jun, C. (2012). Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value. In Journal of Banking and

Finance (Vol. 36, Issue 12, pp. 3248–3259). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.003

Cooper, E. W., & Uzun, H. (2022). Busy outside directors and ESG performance. In Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment

(pp. 1–20). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2122687

Fariha, R., Hossain, M. M., & Ghosh, R. (2022). Board characteristics, audit committee attributes and firm performance:

empirical evidence from emerging economy. In Asian Journal of Accounting Research (Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 84–96). https://

doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-11-2020-0115

Fatemi, A., Glaumb, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure.pdf. Global

Finance Journal Journal, 38, 45–64.

Grosman, A., Aguilera, R. V., & Wright, M. (2019). Lost in translation? Corporate governance, independent boards and blockholder

appropriation. In Journal of World Business (Vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 258–272). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.09.001

Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. In Research in International

Business and Finance (Vol. 61). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668

Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Mohr, D. J. (2012). Directors, Shareholders and Rewards (4th ed.).

Kim, M., & Meivitawanli, B. (2022). Do ESG Ratings Affect Firm Performance of Multi Business Groups.pdf. Research Article.

Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governansi. (2021). Pedoman Umum Governansi Korporat Indonesia (PUGKI). KNKG. Jakarta.

Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governansi. (2022). Pedoman Umum Governansi Sektor Publik Indonesia (PUGSPI). KNKG.

Jakarta.

Kouaib, A., Mhiri, S., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Board of directors’ effectiveness and sustainable performance: The triple bottom

line. In Journal of High Technology Management Research (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100390

Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & Chu, X. (2022). ESG and financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in China’s new

energy companies. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 379). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134721

Mallin, C. A. (2013). Corporate Governance (4th editio).

Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg

Domini Ratings Data. In Business and Society (Vol. 45, Issue 1, pp. 20–46). https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281939

Onasis, R. K. (2016). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang

Terdaftar Di BEI.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan

Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik. Jakarta.

Ruan, W., & Tian, G. (2011). Managerial Ownership and Firm Value : Evidence from China’s Civilian-run Firms Managerial

Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from China’s Civilian-run Firms. In Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance

Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 73–92).

Rudyanto, A., & Pirzada, K. (2020). The role of sustainability reporting in shareholder perception of tax avoidance. In Social

Responsibility Journal (Vol. 17, Issue 5, pp. 669–685). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2020-0022

Ryangga, R., Chomsatu S, Y., & Suhendro, S. (2020). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan Dan Return Saham.

In Jurnal Akuntansi (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 150–159). https://doi.org/10.37932/ja.v9i2.112

Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul.

In Borsa Istanbul Review (Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 525–533). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001

Siagian, F., Siregar, S. V., & Rahadian, Y. (2013). Corporate governance, reporting quality, and firm value, evidence from

Indonesia.pdf. Accounting in Emerging Economies, 3.

Simpson, J., & Taylor, J. (2013). Corporate Governance, Ethics and CSR (p. 104).

Sun, L., & Yu, H. (2022). The effects of busy board on firm’s probability to pay dividends. In Research in International Business

and Finance (Vol. 60). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101596

Swarnapali, R. M. N. C. (2020). Consequences of corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging market. In

International Journal of Law and Management (Vol. 62, Issue 3, pp. 243–265). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-12-2017-0294

Switzer, L. N., Qiao, T., & Wang, J. (2017). Corporate governance and default risk in financial firms over.pdf. Journal of

International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money.

Widyawati, L. (2021). Measurement concerns and agreement of environmental social governance ratings. In Accounting and

Finance (Vol. 61, Issue S1, pp. 1589–1623). https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12638

Withisuphakorn;, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2018). Are Busy DirectorsHarmful orHelpful? Evidence fromtheGreatRecession.pdf. B.E.

Journal OfEconomic Analysis & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0249

Wu, S., Li, X., Du, X., & Li, Z. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership

Structure. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114507

Yu, E. P., Guo, Q., & Luu, B. (2018). Environmental, social, and governance transparency and firm value (Vol. 27, pp. 987–1004)

Downloads

Submitted

09/06/2024

Published

09/18/2024

How to Cite

Sabatini, S. Z., & A. Utama, C. (2024). ESG Performance and Firm Value – Do Busy Directors Help?. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 16(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.2.151-162

How to Cite

Sabatini, S. Z., & A. Utama, C. (2024). ESG Performance and Firm Value – Do Busy Directors Help?. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 16(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.16.2.151-162