Do Professional Commitment and Anticipatory Socialization Affect The Intention To Do Whistleblowing?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.13.3.241-248Keywords:
Anticipatory socialization, Professional commitment, WhistleblowingAbstract
The corruption in Indonesia is one of the biggest problems the government and the business must face. Employee in the entity may provide one of the solutions for this problem. They may do the whistleblowing when they know that there is violation in the entity. Professional commitment and anticipatory socialization are the factors to foster whistleblowing. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the impact of professional commitment and anticipatory socialization toward whistleblowing intention. 155 eligible accounting students are taken as subjects for this study. The questionnaire is disseminated electronically to the sample. As a result, professional commitment affects whistleblowing intentions of accounting students. Furthermore, male who profess professional commitment will likely do the action of whistleblowing compare to female. On the other hand, there is no statistical evidence found to prove that anticipatory socialization affects the intention to do whistleblowing. Consequently, the system of the company must facilitate the improvement of professional commitment so it may foster the intention of the employees to whistleblow. Therefore, manager should pay attention to degree of the professional commitment of the employees.
References
International Research Journal of Business Studies (IRJBS)
Vol.x, No.x, Month 201x, pp. xx~xx
ISSN: 2089-6271 | E-ISSN: 2338-4565 |www.irjbs.com
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2014). Diunduh Oktober 15, 2018, from https://www.acfe.com/report-to the nations/2018/#download
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2016). Diunduh 15 Oktober, 2018, from http://www.acfe.com/rttn2016/resources/downloads.aspx
Ahmad, S. A., Smith, M., & Ismail, Z. (2012). Internal Whistle-Blowing Intentions: A Study of Demographic and Individual Factors. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(11), 1632-1645.
Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2009). The Effects of Auditor Gender on Audit Quality. The Ifcai University Press.
Corruption Perceptions Index. (2018, Februari 21). Diunduh Oktober 15, 2018, from Transparency International: https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017
Clikeman, P. M., & Henning, S. L. (2000). The Socialization of Undergraduate Accounting Students. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 1-17.
Elias, R. (2008). Auditing Students’ Professional Commitment and Anticipatory Socialization and Their Relationship to Whistleblowing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(3), 283-294.
Davis, M. (1996). Some Paradox of Whistleblowing. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 15(1), 3-19.
Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. (1998). Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281-1298.
Fagbemi, T. O. (2017). Whistleblowing Intention: Evidence From Future Accountans in Universities Located in Kwara State, Nigeria. Osogbo Journal of Management, 2(1), 47-56
Garavan, T. N., & Morley, M. (1997). The Socialization of High-Potential Graduates into the Organizations: Initial Expectations, Experiences and Outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(2), 118-137.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS Cetakan VII. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Jalil, F. Y. (2014). Pengaruh Komitmen Profesional dan Sosialisasi Antisipatif Mahasiswa Audit terhadap Perilaku Whistleblowing. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 4(2), 198-209.
Jalilvand, M. R., Vosta, S. N., & Yasini, A. (2017). Motivational Antecedents of Whistleblowing in Iranian Public Service Organizations. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 10(2), 385-408.
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An Examination of Auditor’s Reporting Intentions When Another Auditor is Offered Client Employment. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 45-63.
Kennett, D., Downs, A., & Durler, M. G. (2011). Accounting Student’s Intent to Blow the Whistle on Corporate Fraudelent Financial Reporting: An Experiment. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(14), 14-23.
Liyanarachchi, G., & Adler, R. (2011). Accountants’ Whistle-Blowing Intentions: The Impact of. Australian Accounting Review, 21(2), 167-182.
Loo, R. (2002). The Distribution of Learning Styles and Types For Hard and Soft Business. Educational Psychology, 22(3), 349-360.
Prabowo, H. Y., & Cooper, K. (2016). Re-Understanding Corruption in the Indonesian Public Sector Through Three Behavioral Lenses. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1028-1062.
Marsden, P. V., Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C. R. (1993). Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment. Work and Occupations, 20(3), 368-390.
Mela, N. F., Zarefar, A., & Andreas. (2016). The Relationship of Profesional Commitment of Auditing Student and Anticipatory Socialization toward Whistleblowing Intention. In 3rd Global Conference on Business and Social Science, 219, 507-512
Merton, R. K., & Rossi, A. K. (1968). Contribution to the Theory of References Group Behavior. New York: The Free Press.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2005). Standing Up or Standing by: What Predicts Blowing the Whistle on Organizational Wrongdoing? Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 24, 95-136.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1985). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16.
Neufeldt, V. (1984). Webster’s New World Dictionary. New York: Webster’s New World Clevenland.
Tadu, R., & Mukonya, S. (2016). Challenges of Whistle Blowing as a Corporate Governance Control Tool in the Zimbabwean Banking Sector During 2000-2008. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 6(3), 954-963.
Santrock, J.W. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
Siallagan, H., Rohman, A., & Din, M. (2017). The Effect of Professional Commitment, Attitude, Subjective Norms and Perceived Behavior Control on Whistle Blowing Intention. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 508-519.
Vinten, G. (2000). Whistleblowing Towards Disaster Prevention and Management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 9(1), 18-28.
Weight, W. (1977). An Empirical Study of the Professional Socialization of Accounting Students. International Journal of Accounting, 12(1), 55-77.
Wijayanti, D. M., Kasingku, F. J., & Rukmana, R. (2017). Dilema Etika pada Akuntan – Sebuah Studi Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 4(2), 159-172.
Yetmar, S. A., & Eastman, K. K. (2000). Tax Practitioners’ Ethical Sensitivity: A Model and Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 271-288
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Claudia Tompunu, Frisky Jeremy Kasingku, Ika Prayanthi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
