The Client Risk and The Audit Planning: Influence of Acceptance of Audit Engagement

Authors

  • Deby Suryani Universitas Bunda Mulia , Jakarta
  • Tigor Sitorus Universitas Bunda Mulia , Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.10.3.183-198

Keywords:

Risk, Client, Acceptance, Plan, Audit

Abstract

This study briefly aims to extend the relationship between client risk with the audit planning by proposes the acceptance of audit
engagement as mediate variable to fill a gap prior research, furthermore to determine the effect of client risk toward the audit planning. This research is a quantitative approach with primary data obtained by questionnaires. The population of this study are the auditors of Public Accounting Firm registered in the Directory Indonesian Institute of Accountants (Certified) 2016 in Jakarta and sample purposive about 197 respondents. The Structural Equation Modeling was used to analyze the data. The results of this research shows; (1). The Client Risk directly may affect on the audit planning in a positive but not significantly, (2). Client Risk directly affect the acceptance of audit engagement positively and significantly, (3). The Acceptance of audit engagement has positively and significantly influence on audit planning. Therefore the acceptance of audit engagement perfectly as mediating variable between client risk with the audit planning, where as the acceptance of audit engagement indicated by Time Budget Pressure, Audit Fee. Letter of Auditing and all indicator have a high loading factors.

References

Agoes, Sukrisno. (2016). Auditing Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Arens, Alvin A., Elder, Randal J., & Beasley, Mark S. (2015). Auditing dan Jasa Assurance. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bedard, Jean C., & Johnstone, Karla M. (2004). Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors’ Planning and Pricing Decision. The Accounting Review. Vol 79. No 2. Pp 277-304. in www.researchgate.net

Comiskey, E.E., & Mulford, C.W. (2010). Deteksi Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jakarta: PPM.

Elder, Randal J., Beasley, Mark S., Arens, Alvin A., & Jusuf, Amir Abadi. (2013). Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia). Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ferdinand, A. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro.

Gammal, Walid el. (2012). Determinants of Audit Fees: Evidence From Lebanon. International Business Research. Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. Vol 5. No 11. Pp 136-145. in citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Guy, Dan M., Alderman, Wayne., & Winters, Alan J. (2002). Auditing. Edisi 5. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hassn, Nasr Taha. (2014). The Impact of Earnings Management Risk and Corporate Governance Risk on Auditors’ Decisions. Perceptions of Egyptian Auditors. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting & Auditing. Benha University, Egypt. Vol 1. No 1. Pp 7-27. in http://journals.uob.edu.bh

Hastuti, Theresia Dwi., & Indarto, Stefani Lily. (2014). Decision of Acceptance or Rejection of Assignment Auditing: A test of the Effect of Client Business Risk, Risk Audit, Risk Business Auditor and Adaptation to Risk. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. Soegijapranata Catholic University. Vol 5 issue 1 (Dec), pp.20-29. in seajbel.com

Hat, Ventje., & Korompis, Awdrey CH. (2011). Pengaruh Risiko Manipulasi Earnings dan Risiko Corporate Governance Terhadap Lamanya Perencanaan Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern. Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Vol 22. No 2. pp 1-15. dalam repo.unsrat.ac.id

Kikhia, Hassan Yahia. (2015). Determinants of Audit Fees : Evidence From Jordan. Accounting and Finance Research. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China. Vol 4. No 1. Pp 42-53. in www.sciedu.ca/afr

Kimeli, Elkana Kiptum. (2016). Determinants of Audit Fees Pricing: Evidence From Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). International Journal of Reaserch in Business Studies and Management. Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya. Vol 3. Issues 1. Pp 23-35. in www.ijrbsm.org

Mulyadi. (2013). Auditing. Edisi 6. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mustafa, EQ, Z., & Wijaya, T. (2012). Panduan Teknik Statistik SEM & PLS dengan SPSS AMOS. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Ouertani, insaf., & Ayadi, Salma Damak. (2012). Auditor Engagement Decision : An Exploratory Studi In The Tunisian Context. Journal of Accounting and Management Information System. IHEC Carthage, Tunisia. Vol 11. No 3. Pp 371-390. in ftp://ftp.repec.org

Pardede, Ratlan., & Manurung, Reinhard. (2015). Prosedur dan Aplikasi Program AMOS dalam Penelitian Model Persamaan Struktural. Jakarta: Harfamedia.

Pratistha, K. Dwiyani., & Widhiyani, Ni Luh Sari. (2014). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor dan Besaran Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Proses Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol 6. No 3. Pp 419-428. Dalam ojs.unud.ac.id

Priyatno, Duwi. (2014). SPSS 22: Pengolahan Data Terpraktis. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Reding, Kurt F., Sobel, Paul J., Anderson, Urton L., Head, Michael J., Ramamoorti, Sridhar., Salamasick, Mark., & Riddle, Cris. (2009). Internal Auditing: Assurance & Consulting Services. Second Edition. Florida: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF).

Riahi, Ahmed., & Belkaoui. (2011). Teori Akuntansi. Edisi 5. Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sarjono, Haryadi., & Winda, Julianita. (2011). SPSS VS LISREL: Sebuah Pengantar Aplikasi Untuk Riset. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sensi, Ludovicus. (2006). Evaluasi Manajemen Resiko Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Dalam Keputusan Penerimaan Klien Berdasarkan Pertimbangan dari Risiko Klien, Risiko Audit dan Risiko Bisnis Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonensia. Universitas Indonesia. Vol 3. No 2. pp191-211. Dalam jaki.ui.ac.id

Sugiyono. (2015). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Widagdo, Bambang., & Widayat. (2011). Permodelan Persamaan Structural. Malang: Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2015). Direktori Kantor Akuntan Publik Jakarta 2015. Diunduh pada 4 Oktober 2016. Dalam iapi.or.id/direktori

Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountats. (2015), Auditing Standard 250, download on October, 20, 2016, http://iapi.or.id/Iapi/detail/168

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Profil Akuntan Publik & Kantor Akuntan Publik. Diunduh pada 17 September 2016. Dalam pppk.kemenkeu.go.id

Downloads

Submitted

11/13/2025

Published

11/13/2025

How to Cite

Suryani, D., & Sitorus, T. (2025). The Client Risk and The Audit Planning: Influence of Acceptance of Audit Engagement. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 10(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.10.3.183-198

How to Cite

Suryani, D., & Sitorus, T. (2025). The Client Risk and The Audit Planning: Influence of Acceptance of Audit Engagement. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 10(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.10.3.183-198