Job Satisfaction, Cost Management Knowledge, Budgetary Participation, and Their Impact on Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.9.1.15-29Keywords:
budget participation, cost management knowledge, job satisfaction, managerial performanceAbstract
This research aims to investigate the influence of the manager’s level of cost management knowledge and job satisfaction on the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance. This research uses theoretical framework of individual performance who claims that individual performance is affected by three dimensions of performance which interact each other, i.e. dimensions of opportunity (participatory budget), dimensions of capacity (cost management knowledge) and the dimensions of willingness (job satisfaction). Hypotheses were tested using multivariate regression models that included interaction of three variables (3-way interaction) between budgetary participation, cost management knowledge and job satisfaction to test their effects on managerial performance. Research shows that budget participation which is given to managers with higher cost management knowledge and higher job satisfaction, had no impact to their managerial performance. Managerial performance variation can
be explained by two dimensions. Based on our tests, the findings is consistent that budget participation has positive effect to managerial performance. Further test shows that managerial performance will increase when budget participation combined with high level of cost management knowledge or when budget participation combined with high job satisfaction (2 way interaction). The research also found that the combination of cost management knowledge with high job satisfaction without the opportunity to participate in the budgeting process will actually degrade the managerial performance.
References
A. Agbejule, L. Saarikoski. (2006). “The Effect of Cost Management Knowledge on The Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance.” The British Accounting Review 38 (2006) 427–440.
Blumberg, M., Pringle, C., (1982). “The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance.” Academy of Management Review, 1982. Vol. 7, No. 4, 560 – 569.
Brownell, P., & Merchant, K. (1990).” The Budgetary and Performance Influences Of Product Standardization and Manufacturing Process Automation.” Journal of Accounting Research,28, 388-397.
Brownell, P., & Dunk, A. (1991).” Task Uncertainty and Its Interaction with Budgetary Participation and Budget Emphasis: Some Methodological Issues and Empirical Investigation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16,693-703.
Chenhal, R., & Brownell, P. (1988).” The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Satisfaction and Performance: Role Ambiguity as an Intervening Variable.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, I. 225-234.
Covaleski, M., Evans, Luft, Shields. (2003). “Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration.” Journal Of Management Accounting Research. Volume Fifteen. pp. 3–49
Dunk, A. (1993).” The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on The Relation Between Budgetary Participation and Slack.” The Accounting Review, 68, 400-410.
Govindarajan, V., (1986). “Impact of Participation in The Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic And Contingency Perspectives.” Decision Sciences 17, 496–516.
J. Jermias, T. Setiawan. (2008).” The Moderating Effects of Hierarchy and Control Systems on The Relationship between Budgetary Participation and Performance.” The International Journal of Accounting, 43 (2008) 268–292
Kenis, I. (1979). “Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance.” The Accounting Review, 54, 707-72 1.
Kren, L. (1990).” Performance in a Budget-Based Control System: An Extended Expectancy Theory Model Approach.” Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2,100-l 12.
Lopez, M., Stammerjohan, W., Lee, Kyoo Sang. (2009). “Budget Participation and Job Performance of South Korean Managers Mediated by Job Satisfaction and Job Relevant Information,” Management Research News, Vol. 32 No. 3. pp. 220-238
Mahoney, T., Jerdee, T., Carroll, S., (1965). “The Jobs of Management.” Industrial Relations 4, 97–110.
Meiliana. (2003). “Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Informasi Job relevant sebagai Variabel yang Memoderasi Pengaruh Karakteristik Sistem Penganggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial,” Tesis. Magister Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Merchant, K. (1984). Influences on Departmental Budgeting: an Empirical Examination of a Contingency Model. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 291-310.
Mia, L. (1988). “ Managerial Attitude, Motivation and The Effectiveness of Budget Participation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 465-476.
Patterson, M., West, M. A., Lawthom, R., Nickell, S. (1997). “Impact of People Management Practises on Business
Performance.” Issues in People Management. Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield. Institute of Personnel and Development, London, UK.
Setiawaty, Anita Endang. (2002). “Pengaruh Motivasi terhadap Keefektifan Penganggaran Partisipatif dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Manajerial,” Tesis. Magister Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Setyadi, Heru. (2002). “Pengaruh Locus of Control terhadap Keefektifan Penganggaran Partisipatif dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Manajerial.” Tesis. Magister Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Shields, M. D., and S. M. Young. (1993). “Antecedents and Consequences of Participative Budgeting: Evidence on The Effects of Asymmetrical Information.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 5: 265–280.
Shields, M., Young, M., (1994).” Managing Innovation Costs: a Study of Cost Conscious Behavior by R&D Professionals.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 6, 175–196.
Shields, M., Shields, D. (1998). “Antecedents of Participative Budgeting.” Accounting Organizations and Society 23, 49–76.
Weiss, D.J., Davis, R.V., England, G.W. and Lofquist, L.H. (1967). ‘‘Manual for The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire,’’ Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation XXII, October, Bulletin 45.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Aria Farahmita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
