A Qualitative Study of Knowledge Exchange in an Indonesian Machine-Making Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.9.2.75-92Keywords:
social capital, knowledge exchange, supply chain, qualitative studyAbstract
In a supply chain, company’s ability to leverage knowledge that resides within the network of contracted and interacting firms is able to improve not only company performance but also the supply chain effectiveness as a whole. However, existing supply chain studies mostly discuss knowledge at company level, and rarely at internal-hierarchical levels. As a result, many things remain concealed, for example, how knowledge exchange between people across levels in a supply chain is influenced by the supply chain government. Moreover, most exsisting studies focus on a rigid hierarchical supply-chain mechanism, and hardly elaborate how interactions in a less-rigid mechanism. This article attempts to address these gaps, discussing how a supplier company that deals with innovation generation activities acquires knowledge that resides in its supply chain network. A qualitative case study about an Indonesian machine-making company has been chosen to represent one of supplier types in the automotive industry that deals with less-rigid mechanism. A social capital perspective is applied to shed light on how interactions between actors in a supply chain network influence knowledge exchange. The study finds out a positive relationship between social capital and knowledge exchange across levels and functions to help generate innovations, allowing the company to manage conflicting effect beliefs more effectively. The study also identifies a tendency of the company to regard intensive knowledge exchange as part of organizational learning process.
References
Aggarwal, V. A., Siggelkow, N. & Singh, H. (2011). Governing Collaborative Activity: Interdependence and the Impact of Coordination and Exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 705-730.
Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the Meaning of Collaboration in the Supply Chain. Supply Chain Management, 9, 30-43.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research method, New York, Oxford University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes, the social structure of competition, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
Carey, S. & Lawson, B. (2011). Governance and Social Capital Formation in Buyer‐Supplier Relationships. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22, 152-170.
Cicourel, A. V. (1973). Cognitive Sociology, Harmondsworth, England, Penguin Books.
Contu, A. & Willmott, H. (2006). Studying Practice: Situating Talking About Machines. Organization Studies, 27, 1769-1782.
Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B. & Petersen, K. J. (2006). Creating Supply Chain Relational Capital: The Impact of Formal and Informal Socialization Processes. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 851-863.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design - Choosing among five approaches, California, SAGE Publications.
Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift, reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century, New York, The Guilford Press.
Elg, U. & Johansson, U. (1997). Decision Making in Inter-firm Networks as a Political Process. Organization Studies, 18, 361-384.
Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for Practice: a Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13-47.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic strategy. In: Nohria, N. & Eccles R. G. (eds.) Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Gulati, R. & Singh, H. (1998). The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781-814.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
Inkpen, A. C. & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146-165.
Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B. & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The Relationships between Supplier Development, Commitment, Social Capital Accumulation and Performance Improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 528-545.
Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C. & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Management, 9, 1-19.
Larson, A. (1992). Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76-104.
Leana, C. R. & Buren, H. J. V. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 539-555.
Li, Y., Ye, F. & Sheu, C. 2014. Social Capital, Information Sharing and Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34, 1440-1462.
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view, Palgrave Macmillan.
Macneil, I. R. (1985). Relational contract: what we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 483-525.
Mentzer, J. T., Dewitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D. & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 1-25.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249-273.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal Management 13(4), 337-348.
Podolny, J. M. & Page, K. L. (1998). Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.
Poppo, L. & Zenger, T. (2002). Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707-725.
Smitka, M. J. (1991). Competitive ties, subcontracting in the Japanese automotive industry, New York, Columbia University Press.
Squire, B., Cousins, P. D. & Brown, S. (2009). Cooperation and Knowledge Transfer within Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Moderating Properties of Trust, Relationship Duration and Supplier Performance. British Journal of Management, 20, 461-477.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publications.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
Tsoukas, H. & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is Organizational Knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38, 973-994.
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E. & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The Dark Side of Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Social Capital Perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 561-576.
Whipple, J. M., Wiedmer, R. & Boyer, K. K. (2015). A Dyadic Investigation of Collaborative Competence, Social Capital, and Performance in Buyer‐Supplier Relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51, 1-38.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting, New York, The Free Press.
Zheng, W. (2008). A Social Capital Perspective of Innovation from Individuals to Nations: Where is Empirical Literature Directing Us? International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 151-183.
Zhou, K. Z., Zhang, Q., Sheng, S., Xie, E. & Bao, Y. (2014). Are Relational Ties Always Good for Knowledge Acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China. Journal of Operations Management, 32, 88-98.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Indria Handoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
