Gagalkah TransJakarta?
Kajian Kualitas Layanan pada Sistem Angkutan Cepat Massal TransJakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/Keywords:
Public Transportation, Bus Rapid Transit, Service Quality, Importance-Performance Analysis, TransJakartaAbstract
The research aimed to study the busway users’ understanding, attitude, and behavior toward the quality of TransJakarta service, in order to provide alternative solution over the complexity of massive transportation problems in DKI Jakarta, as the capital city of Indonesia. In addition, the research presented some inputs to overcome the transportation problems in Jakarta that can be used as points of evaluation for other cities in Indonesia which have prepared or are preparing to make use of bus rapid transit system. The research was focused on the quality of TransJakarta service, and identified the necessary atributes to produce an optimum public service quality–as a part of social engineering study on massive transport system. The analysis used Service Quality (SERVQUAL) dan Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) concepts, done through surveys on 450 respondents on eight busway corridors. The result showed that the users of TransJakarta value most the dimension of empathy and quite the reverse value worst the dimension of tangible. The data showed that empathy is the dimension in which service quality “is considered” most likely improved. While other dimensions, especially the dimensions of tangible, responsiveness and assurance ‘are considered’ already given, since the TransJakarta users regard them as being outside the management limit of Public Service Board of TransJakarta.
References
Afrial, Rozy J. (2008). Kualitas pelayanan publik kecamatan setelah perubahan kedudukan dan fungsi camat sebagai perangkat daerah (Studi perbandingan Kecamatan Katapang Kabupaten Bandung dan Kecamatan Dramaga Kabupaten Bogor). Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Belum Dipublikasikan, Jakarta.
Afrial, Rozy J. (2009). Kualitas pelayanan publik kecamatan setelah perubahan kedudukan dan fungsi camat sebagai perangkat daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi: Bisnis & Birokrasi, 16(2), Mei–Agustus.
Agere, Sam. (2000). Promoting good governance, principles, practices, and perspectives. Management and Training Services Division. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Albrecht, Karl. (1985). Service within: Solving the middle management leadership crisis. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Albrecht, Karl, & Zemke, Ron. (1990). Service America! Doing business in the new economy. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Erwin.
Bahill, A. T., & Gissing, B. (1998). Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 28(4), 516–527.
Berita Jakarta. (2009, September 25). 21,2% pengguna kendaraan pribadi beralih ke busway. Diunduh dari http://www.beritajakarta.com/2008
. Diakses tanggal 20 Mei 2010.
Brady, Michael K., & Cronin, J. Joseph Jr. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3).
Bell, Antony. (2006). Great leadership: What it is and what it takes in a complex world. California: Davies-Black Publishing.
Camp, Robert C. (1989). The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Oregon, USA: American Society for Quality Control Press.
Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. (2003). Peraturan Daerah Nomor 12 Tahun 2003 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan, Kereta Api, Sungai dan Danau serta Penyebrangan di Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta.
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. (1999). Pedoman perencanaan jalur pejalan kaki pada jalan umum, No. 032/T/BM/1999.
Ditjen Perhubungan Darat. (1998). Petunjuk teknis sistem transportasi perkotaan. Jakarta: Ditjen Perhubungan Darat.
Dwiyanto, Agus, et al. (2005). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Dwiyanto, Agus. (2005). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1986). Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives of Bowman’s risk-return paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 395–409.
Fitriati, Rachma. (2009). Quo vadis keberlangsungan program bus TransJakarta. Jurnal Forum Ilmiah Indonusa, 6(2), 108–116.
Forum Dialog Konsumen Bus TransJakarta. (2010). YLKI serta Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP), Jakarta.
Gilbert, Alan. (2008). Bus rapid transit: Is Transmilenio a miracle cure? Transport Journal Reviews, 28, 439–467.
Haglund, Lars, & Stalhammar, Anna. (2001). Market and service orientation in public transportation. Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies.
International Energy Agency. (2002). Bus systems for the future. Paris: Publications Service DECD/IEA.
Keehley, Patricia, et al. (1997). Benchmarking for best practices in the public sector. California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Jiang, James J., Klein, Garry L., & Carr, Christopher. (2002). Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quarterly, 26(2).
Keputusan Gubernur Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. (2003). Nomor 110 Tahun 2003 tentang pembentukan Badan Pengelola TransJakarta—Busway Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Kompas. (2008, November 17). Rapor merah bus TransJakarta.
Kompas. (2009, January 15). Tahun TransJakarta: Tujuan utama belum tercapai.
Kompas. (2009, November 23). Layanan busway di DKI kian buruk.
Kompas. (2010, January 4). Agar steril, portal busway akan ditambah. Diunduh dari http://regional.kompas.com. Diakses 14 Mei 2010.
Kompas. (2010, April 24). Busway mendekati gagal.
Kompas.com. (2009, July 22). Busway butuh mikrobus ber-AC untuk feeder. Diunduh dari http://megapolitan.kompas.com. Diakses 14 Mei 2010.
Latu, T. M., & Everett, A. M. (2000). Review of satisfaction research and measurement approaches. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. Diunduh dari http://www.doc.govt.nz.
Levine, Charles H., et al. (1990). Public administration: Challenges, choice, consequences. Illinois: Scott Foreman.
Lovelock, Christopher. (1994). How product + service = competitive advantage. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Mahmudi. (2007). Analisis persepsi pengguna tentang kualitas pelayanan informasi ilmiah pada Pusat Dokumentasi Ilmiah LIPI. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Depok: Program Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Administrasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
Martilla, John A., & James, John C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
Martinez, C. L. (2003). Evaluation report: Tools cluster networking meeting #1. Arizona: CenterPoint Institute, Inc.
Mendoza, Magdalena L. (2000). Measuring good governance in Philippines. Pasig City: Development Academy of the Philippines.
Mess, Paul, Moriarty, Patrick, Stone, John, & Buxton, Michael. (2006). Putting the public interest back into public transport: A report to the Victorian community. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Monash University, Swinburne University, and RMIT University.
Neo, Boon Siong, & Chen, Geraldine. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities, and change in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte.
Neuman, William Lawrence. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approach (3rd ed.). Ohio: Allyn and Bacon.
Okezone.com. (2009, July 3). Park and ride busway akan ditambah. Diunduh dari http://news.okezone.com
. Diakses 14 Mei 2010.
Osborne, David, & Gaebler, Ted. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin Books.
Osborne, David, & Plasterik, P. (1996). Banishing bureaucracy, the five strategy reinventing government. Persus Books Publishing.
OECD. (2002). Benchmarking intermodal/freight transport. Paris: Centre Francais d’Exploitation du Droit de Copie (CFC).
Prasojo, Eko, Perdana, Aditya, & Hiqmah, Nor. (2006). Kinerja pelayanan publik, persepsi masyarakat terhadap kinerja, keterlibatan dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pelayanan bidang pendidikan, kesehatan, dan kependudukan. Jakarta: YAPPIKA.
Sancoko, Bambang. (2010). Pengaruh remunerasi terhadap kualitas pelayanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi: Bisnis & Birokrasi, 17(1).
Sekaran, Uma. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Setiawan, Rudy. (2005). Analisa tingkat kepuasan pengguna kereta api komuter Surabaya-Sidoarjo. Simposium VIII FSTPT, Universitas Sriwijaya, 5-6 Desember.
Sinambela, Lijan P., et al. (2006). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sinar Harapan. (2010, May 17). Angkot Tangsel tolak feeder TransJakarta.
Spendolini, Michael J. (1992). The benchmarking book. New York: Amazon.
Sugihardjo. (2005). Evaluasi program busway di DKI Jakarta. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Depok: Program Pasca Sarjana Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
Supranto, J. (2007). Pengukuran tingkat kepuasan pelanggan, untuk menaikkan pangsa pasar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Thoha, Miftah. (2008). Ilmu administrasi publik kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Trilestari, Wirajatmi Endang. (2004). Model kinerja pelayanan publik dengan pendekatan system thinking dan system dynamic, studi kasus pelayanan pendidikan di Kota Bandung. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Depok: Program Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Administrasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
Wiruymakti, Anastuti. (2007). Kualitas pelayanan Dinas Kebersihan dan Lingkungan Hidup Kota Depok. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Depok: Program Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Administrasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
Wright, Hook (Editor). (2007). Bus rapid transit planning guide. New York: Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP).
Zeithaml, Valarie A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, Leonard L. (1995). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Inc.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Rachma Fitriati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
