Strategi Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja dan Daya Saing

Studi Kasus Galangan Kapal Kawasan Pulau Batam dan Jawa

Authors

  • Bagiyo Suwasono Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya
  • Sjarief Widjaja Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya
  • Ahmad Zubaydi Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya
  • M. Zaed Yuliadi PT. PAL Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/

Keywords:

produktivitas tenaga kerja, daya saing galangan kapal, PLS path modeling

Abstract

The strength of international competitiveness encouraged a shipyard to reduce cost of materials and labor. Therefore, a shipyard did a measurement to improve the rationalization toward labor productivity. This study aimed to compare the path model from strategies of labor productivity and competitiveness of medium size shipyard in region of Batam and Java. The normality test of questionnaire data at 200 respondents who are competent in the field of shipbuilding through the ratio of skewness and kurtosis did not show normal distribution from the data. Test of model feasibility through PLS algorithm and bootstrapping showed moderate criterion and no significant difference in the variable path for both regions. The first latent variable: shipyard competitiveness is influenced by the strategic policy and labor productivity, while the second latent variable: labor productivity is influenced by work activity, strategic policy, and corporate culture. Test of model segmentation through FIMIX-PLS showed good criterion and no significant difference in the interaction of variable heterogeneity for both regions. The final result of shipyards PLS path modeling showed a consistent relationship between strategic policy and labor productivity in order to increase the Indonesian shipyard competitiveness.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 328-347.

Bashiruddin, J. (2002). Pengaruh bising dan getaran pada kesimbangan dan pendengaran (Disertasi). Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Bruce, G. J., & Garrard, I. (1999). The business of shipbuilding. London: LLP Reference Publishing.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Drewry (1999). World shipbuilding report. Drewry Shipping Consultant Limited, England.

European Commission & Lloyd’s Register–Fairplay (2002). On the situation in world shipbuilding: Fifth report from the Commission to the Council. Brussels

Ferdinand, A. (2005). Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen: Aplikasi model-model rumit dalam penelitian untuk tesis magister dan disertasi doktor (Edisi 3). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 328-388.

Gebhardt, L. P., & Jarvis, R. G. (2003). Productivity improvement at the SENESCO shipyard. Journal of Ship Production, 19(3), 187-193.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. R., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

ICAF (2005). Shipbuilding report 2005. Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, USA.

Instruksi Presiden No. 5 Tahun 2005 tentang pemberdayaan industri pelayaran nasional.

Joseph, S. (2005). Network development productivity. APINDO, Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia.

Kartiko (2004). Peningkatan daya saing mutu produk manufaktur dengan menerapkan sistem produksi tepat waktu. Divisi Harkan, Media PAL Indonesia, 35, 18-19, 26-27.

Kadiman, K., & Suryohadiprodjo, A. H. (2005). Dengan Inpres No. 5 diharapkan teknologi perkapalan bangkit. Acara Tema Diskusi: Kebangkitan Teknologi Perkapalan Indonesia, 27 Juli, Surabaya.

KPIN (2004). Analisa daya saing sektor industri internasional sektor industri, kebijakan pembangunan industri nasional. Departemen Perindustrian Republik Indonesia.

Levin, R. I., & Rubin, D. S. (1998). Statistics for management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mulyatno, I. P. (2004). Optimizing based sensitivity for shipyard productivity in Indonesia. Majalah Kapal, 8(3), 1, 62-66.

Nagatsuka, S. (2000). Study of the productivity of Japan and South Korea’s shipbuilding yards based on statistical data. Japan Maritime Research Institute (JAMRI), The Manufacturing Technology (MANTECH) Program and National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP).

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Panggabean, H. (2001). Characteristics of interculture sensitivity in Indonesia-German work groups. (Dissertation, Regensburg University).

Ramaswamy, V., Wayne, S. D., David, J. R., & William, T. R. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12(1), 103-124.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). Available at http://www.smartpls.de.

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. A. (2010). Response-based segmentation using finite mixture partial least squares: Theoretical foundation and an application to American customer satisfaction index data. In R. Stahlbock, S. F. Crone, & Lessmann (Eds.), Annals of Information Systems: Special Issue on Data Mining, Vol. 8 (pp. 19-49). Berlin-Heidelberg.

Santoso, S. (2000). Buku latihan SPSS statistik parametrik. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Gramedia.

Santosa, G. (2004). Manajemen keselamatan & kesehatan kerja (Cetakan pertama). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Sarstedt, M. (2008). A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modeling. Journal of Modeling in Management, 3(2), 140-161.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.

Sinungan, M. (2005). Produktivitas: Apa dan bagaimana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Supomo, H. (2005). Analisa pengaruh tingkat fasilitas produksi terhadap cost/CGT. Majalah Ilmiah Kelautan Neptunus, 12(1), 33-38.

Sugiyono (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D (Cetakan keempat). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sutjana, I. D. P. (2006). Hambatan dalam penerapan K3 dan ergonomi di perusahaan. Seminar Ergonomi dan K3 di Surabaya, http://ejournal.unud.ac.id/.

Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computer Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.

Downloads

Submitted

11/21/2025

Published

08/01/2010

How to Cite

Suwasono, B., Widjaja, S., Zubaydi, A., & Yuliadi, M. Z. (2010). Strategi Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja dan Daya Saing: Studi Kasus Galangan Kapal Kawasan Pulau Batam dan Jawa. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 3(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.21632/

How to Cite

Suwasono, B., Widjaja, S., Zubaydi, A., & Yuliadi, M. Z. (2010). Strategi Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja dan Daya Saing: Studi Kasus Galangan Kapal Kawasan Pulau Batam dan Jawa. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 3(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.21632/