Pengaruh Motivasi pada Kinerja Belajar

Pengujian Terhadap Sebuah Model

Authors

  • Levi Nilawati Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya Jakarta
  • I. Dwinanto Bimo Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/

Keywords:

Kepribadian proaktif, motivasi belajar, kinerja belajar

Abstract

Academic success predictor consists of cognitive measurement, mental intelligence and noncognitive measurement such as personality traits. The desire to accomplish study on time with satisfying achievement is a motivation to study for students. This impetus is a crucial factor for proactive students to attain academic performance. Even if a student has a high intelligence level,
without learning motiviation, he or she most likely will fail. Studies of the influence of proactive personality traits on learning performance have received little attention. This research developed and tested a model linking proactive personality to learning performance through a learning motivation by surveying a sample of 272 economics students from a private university in Jakarta. Results from simple regression showed that proactive personality was related to learning performance and learning motivation. Then, learning motivation was related to learning performance. Hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that learning motivation wasn’t mediating the relationship between proactive personality and learning performance. Future research direction and practical implication (for business) of the result are discussed.

References

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.

Birdi, K., Allan, C., & Warr, P. (1997). Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 845-857.

Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532-537.

Colquitt, J., LePine, J., & Noe, R. (2000). Toward an integrated theory of training motivation: A metaanalytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five personality taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. University of California, Berkeley.

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807.

Kuncoro, M. (2001). Metode kuantitatif: Teori dan aplikasi untuk bisnis dan ekonomi. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Lounsbury, J. W., & Ridgell, S. D. (2004). Predicting academic success: General intelligence, "Big Five" personality traits, and work drive. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-126386901.html.

Meng-Lei, H. (2004). The relationship between Big Five personality traits, motivation, and learning performance of hospitality students in Taiwan. National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), USA.

Nilawati, L. (2005). Pengaruh pemediasian political influence behaviour terhadap hubungan antara proactive personality dan kesuksesan karir. Artikel disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Program Master dan Doktoral Universitas Gadjah Mada Tahun 2006 (unpublished).

Nilawati, L., Lukito, A. S., & Efendi (2010). Pengembangan model kompetensi yang mendukung sistem pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi. Hibah Penelitian Dikti Tahun 2009.

Noe, R. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749.

Noe, R., Hollenbeck, G., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. (2006). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Noe, R., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497-523.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.

Nowack, M., Maul, M., Kraus, T., & Hansch, M. (2009). Knowledge management supporting education and research at a university cleanroom. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 100-112.

Parkinson, J., & Taggar, S. (2006). Intelligence, personality, and performance on case studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3).

Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., & Schippmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5).

Rosendaal, B. (2009). Sharing knowledge, being different, and working as a team. Knowledge Management & Practice, 7, 4-14.

Robbins, S., & Judge, T. A. (2010). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Pearson.

Schriesheim, C. A., & Hinkin, T. R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 246-257.

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427.

Seibert, S. E. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality traits-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.

Turner, J. E. (2003). Proactive personality and the Big Five as predictors of motivation to learn. Unpublished dissertation, Old Dominion University.

Thoresen, C. J., Bliese, P. D., Bradley, J. C., & Thoresen, R. H. (2004). The Big Five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 835–853.

Uyanto, S. S. (2006). Pedoman analisis data dengan SPSS (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Downloads

Submitted

11/21/2025

Published

11/27/2025

How to Cite

Nilawati, L., & Bimo, I. D. (2025). Pengaruh Motivasi pada Kinerja Belajar: Pengujian Terhadap Sebuah Model. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 3(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.21632/

How to Cite

Nilawati, L., & Bimo, I. D. (2025). Pengaruh Motivasi pada Kinerja Belajar: Pengujian Terhadap Sebuah Model. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 3(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.21632/