Ownership Concentration and Firm Value
A Panel Data Analysis on The Impact of Ownership Concentration on Firm Value
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/Keywords:
ownership concentration, firm value, panel regressionAbstract
This study examines the impact of ownership concentration on firm value. This study finds a negative and significant relationship between ownership concentration (measured by aggregate substantial shareholdings and the presence of controlling shareholders) and firm value. This suggests that large or controlling shareholders can extract the private benefits of control which in turn leads to lower firm value. The results support the rent extraction hypothesis, but not the agency relationship.
References
Alchian, A. A., & Woodward, S. (1988). Review of Williamson’s Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 65–79.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.
Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1991). Negotiated block trades and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 46, 861–878.
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1989). Private benefits from control of public corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 371–395.
Bebchuk, L. (1999). A rent protection theory of corporate ownership and control. Working Paper, Harvard University.
Brickley, J., Lease, R., & Smith, C. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267–291.
Burkart, M. (1995). Initial shareholdings and overbidding in takeover contests. Journal of Finance, 50, 1491–1416.
Burnett, B. (2001). Australian Corporations Law. North Ryde: CCH Australia.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741–2771.
Craswell, A. T., Taylor, S. L., & Saywell, R. A. (1997). Ownership structure and corporate performance: Australian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5, 301–323.
Dann, L. Y., & DeAngelo, H. (1983). Standstill agreements, privately negotiated stock repurchases, and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 275–301.
Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209–233.
Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. Journal of Finance, 59, 537–600.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Faccio, M., Lang, L., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91, 54–78.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 11, 42–64.
Holderness, C. G., & Sheehan, D. P. (1988). The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 317–346.
Holthausen, R. W., Leftwich, R. W., & Mayers, D. (1990). Large-block transactions, the speed of response, and temporary and permanent stock-price effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 71–95.
Lamba, A., & Stapledon, G. (2001). The determinants of corporate ownership structure: Australian evidence. Working Paper 20, Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.
Loderer, C., & Martin, K. (1997). Executive ownership and performance: Tracking faint traces. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 223–255.
Mikkelson, W., & Ruback, R. S. (1985). An empirical analysis of interfirm equity investment process. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 523–553.
Mínguez-Vera, A., & Martín-Ugedo, J. F. (2007). Does ownership structure affect value? A panel data analysis for the Spanish market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 16, 81–98.
Nenova, T. (2003). The value of corporate voting rights and control: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 325–351.
Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 229–255.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zwiebel, J. (1995). Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 161–185.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Lukas Setia Atmaja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






