The Implementation of Knowledge Strategy-Based Entrepreneurial Capacity to Achieve Sustainable Competitive Advantage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.6.2.73-87Keywords:
Innovativeness, Proactive, Risk-taking, knowledge strategy, sustainable competitive advantageAbstract
This study aims to develop a model of knowledge strategy-based entrepreneurial capacity to achieve sustainable competitive
advantage of rurol banking in Central Java province. The sampling method is ‘‘Purposive sampling’’ by considering the characteristics of the population items, namely: operational experience for at least 5 years and representatives of each area of rurol banking in Semarang, Surakarta and Purwokerto. Then, the sample size is 150 of 251 (59.7%) of top managers of rurol banking. To analyze the data in this study, it used the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), of the, AMOS software package. The findings of this study explain that 1). The first step in promoting a sustainable competitive advantage through knowledge sharing is by prioritizing the quality of interaction, willingness and ability. 2). Efforts to improve a sustainable competitive advantage through knowledge exploitation built by knowledge sharing are by prioritizing to actively accept changes and introduction, solve problems together, use and combine new knowledge in operation. 3). Efforts to improve a sustainable competitive advantage through the knowledge exploitation built by risk-taking are by prioritizing a strong tendency for high-risk projects (with the possibility of gaining high-return), a high courage for the actions necessary to achieve the goal, having an aggressive attitude to optimize the possibility of utilizing existing potential opportunities and enjoying the challenge of the risk situation. 4). Efforts to improve a sustainable competitive advantage through knowledge exploitation built by a pro-active are by prioritizing to anticipate problem more quickly than competitors, future oriented, addressed by technology, launching product selectively and systematically search for new ideas. 5). Efforts to improve a sustainable competitive advantage through knowledge exploitation built by the innovativeness are by prioritizing the speed of developing products, the implementation of new technology and market development.
References
Alberto F. De Toni. Fabio Nonino and Matteo Pivetta. (2011). A Model for Assessing the Coherence of Companies’ Knowledge Strategy. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 9. 327–341
Astha Sharma and Suniita Dave. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation: Performance Level. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, pp.43-52
Barney, J.B. (1991), ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,’ Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
Bart van den Hooff;de Ridder, Jan A. (2004). Knowledge haring in context: the influence of organizational Journal of Knowledge Management. Volume 8 Nomor (6). pp. 117-130
Cardon, M.S. & Kirk, C. (2010). Passion and persistence in entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Montreal.
Chung-Jen Chen. Jing-Wen Huang. Yung-Chang Hsiao. (2010). Knowledge management andinnovativeness The role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower.Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 848-870
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JK. (2000). Dynamic capabilities:what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–1121.
Ferdinand Augusty Tae (2000). Structural Equation Modelling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen . Diponegoro University press.
Frank D. Belschak and Deanne N. Den Hartog. (2010). Pro-self, prosocial, and pro-organizational fociof proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 83, 475-498
Gagn´e M, Deci EL.(2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
Gary J. Greguras and James M. Diefenddorff. (2010). Why Does proactive Personality Predict Employee Life satisfaction and Work Behavior ? A Field Investigation of The Mediating Role of The Self Concordance Model. Personnel Psychology,Nomor 63,pp. 539–560
Grant, R.M. (1996). ‘‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’’, Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 17, pp. 109-22.
Gregory G. Dess and Lumpkin. G.T. (2005). The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 2005, Vol. 19, No. 1
Jahangir Yadollahi . Arash R. Amer Dehghan N.(2013). Social Capital and Organizational Innovation : The Mediating effect of Entrepreneurial Oriention. Journal of Community Positive Practices, XIII(2), pp.22-40.
Jeffrey G. Covin. William J. Wales. (2012). The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Enterpreneurship Theory and Practice. 677-702
Jime´nez Daniel Jime´nez and Raquel Sanz-Valle. 2011. Could HRM Support Organizational Innovation?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol. 19, No. 7, pp.1208–1221
Juan G. Cegarra-Navarro and Frank Dewhurst. (2007). Linking Organizational learningand Customer Capital Through Anambidexterity Context: an empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 18:10 .pp.1720–1735
Jun Li and Weihe Gao. (2011). Social Capital, Knowledge Strategy, and New Venture Performance: Evidence From Graduate Entrepreneurial Ventures in China. International Business Administration. 8 (1).pp. 378-383
Lin, Hsiu-Fen. 2007, ‘‘A Stage Model of Knowledge Management : an empirical investigation of process and effectiveness’’, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 643-59.
Lin. Hsiu-Fen.(2010). Antecedents of The Stage-Based Knowledge Management Evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol 15 No.1 pp. 136-155
Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess,C.G. (1997). “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 135-72.
Lumpkin. G.T , Keith H. Brighamb and Todd W. Mossb. (2010). Long-term Orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. Vol. 22, Nos. 3–4, 241–264.
Mario J. Donate and J. Ignacio Canales. (2011). A New Approach to The Concept of Knowledge Strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 22-44,
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patrick M. Kreiser . Louis D. Marino, (2013). Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Business Economy . Nomor 40, pp.273–291
Paul E. Bierly III, Fariborz Damanpour and Michael D. Santoro. (2009). The Application of External Knowledge : Organizational Conditions for Explorationand Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies 46 : 3. pp.481-509
Qian Huang, Robert M. Davison* & Jibao Gu.(2011). The Impact of Trust, Quanxi Orientation and Face on the Intention of Chinese Employees and Managers to Engage in peer-to-peer Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing. Info Systems Journal. Nomor 21, pp. 557–577
Reed, Srinivasan dan Doty. (2009). Adapting Human and Social Capital to ImpactPerformance: Some Empirical Findings from the U.S.Personal Banking Sector. Journal of Managerial issues . Vol 21. Number 1 Spring: pp. 36-57
Rifat Kamas,ak and Fu¨sun Bulutlar. 2010. The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Innovation. European Business Review. Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 306-317.
Saowaluk Jitno. (2009). Effects of Entrepreneurial Capacity on Business of SMEs in Thailand. Journal International of Business Economics. Volume 9 (1) 1-18
Tatiana Andreeva and Aino Kianto. (2011). Knowledge Processes, Knowledge Intensity and Innovation : a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 15 No. 6. pp. 1016-1034
Mukesh Srivastava, Andy Franklin, Louis Martinette. (2013). Building a Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal Technology Management. Innovation. Volume 8, Issue 2.pp.47-60
Verena C. Hahn.Michael Frese.Carmen Binnewies. Antje Schmitt. (2012). Happy and Proactive? The Role of Hedonicand Eudaimonic Well-Being inBusiness Owners’Personal Initiative. Enterpreneurship Theory and Practice. 97-111
Wang, C.L. (2008). “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance”,Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 635-56.
Wang. Catherine L and Levent Altinay. (2011). The influence of anentrepreneur’s socio-culturalcharacteristics on
theentrepreneurial orientation ofsmall firms. Journal of Small Business andEnterprise Development. Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 673-694
Weiping Liu .(2006). Knowledge Exploitation, Knowledge Exploration, and Competency Trap. Knowledge and Process Management. Volume 13 Number 3 pp 144–16
Widodo. (2011). Strategy evaluation rurol banking in Central Java Province. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Ekonomi, Kopertis Central Java Province. Vol.7.( 2) 113-133
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Author(s) Rights
For IRJBS to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the Author(s) and IRJBS. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to IRJBS, while Authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. IRJBS supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.
As a journal Author, you have rights to many uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in IRJBS journals have comprehensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:
- use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by the author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes,
(But it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Still, they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors' detail information), a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made (Publisher indicates the modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications.
Authors/Readers/Third Parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
