Subsidiary Roles on the MNC Strategy

Authors

  • Irene Stajanoska University of Groningen
  • Joy Elly Tulung Sam Ratulangi University, Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21632/

Keywords:

Subsidiary roles, network embeddedness, Headquarters and Subsidiary relationship

Abstract

This article is a conceptual and typological framework that delineates the subsidiary role and its influence on the MNC strategy. The purpose of this study is two fold. First we want to formulate proposition for testing the relationship between the network embeddedness, resource dependence and subsidiary influence on the corporate strategy. Secondly we want to suggest a typology for determination of the specific characteristics of subsidiaries that are simply implementors of HQ assigned strategy, have a global subsidiary mandates or are somewhere in between. Finally the article suggests direction for future research.

References

Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. Sage.

Andersson, U. (1999). Notes on subsidiary network embeddedness. Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.

Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1995). Changing the role of top management. Harvard Business Review, May–June.

Birkinshaw, J. (1996). World mandate strategies for Canadian subsidiaries. Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics, Working Paper No. 9.

Cook, K., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(October), 721–738.

Davis, G., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1–37.

Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(February), 31–41.

Forsgren, M. (1989). Managing the internationalization process: The Swedish case. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(3), 508–514.

Forsgren, M. (1990). Managing the international multi-centre firm: Case studies from Sweden. European Management Journal, 8, 261–267.

Forsgren, M., & Pahlberg, C. (1999). Managing international networks: A presentation of a research project. Proceedings of the 7th IMP Conference, Uppsala.

Galbraith, J. R., & Nathanson, D. A. (1978). Strategy implementation: The role of structure and process. West Publishing Company.

Grabher, G. (1993). Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm. Routledge.

Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 82–97.

Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3; Special Issue), 203–215.

Holm, U., Johanson, J., & Thilenius, P. (1995). HQ knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the MNC. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(1–2), 97–119.

Larsson, A. (1985). Structure and change: Power in transnational enterprise. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business.

McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1158.

Palmer, D., Barber, B., Zhou, X., & Soysal, Y. (1995). The friendly and the predatory acquisition of large U.S. corporations in the 1960s: The other contested terrain. American Sociological Review, 60, 469–499.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.

Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission. Free Press.

Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

White, R., & Poynter, T. A. (1984). Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly.

Downloads

Submitted

11/25/2025

Published

12/01/2008

How to Cite

Stajanoska, I., & Tulung, J. E. (2008). Subsidiary Roles on the MNC Strategy. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 1(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.21632/

How to Cite

Stajanoska, I., & Tulung, J. E. (2008). Subsidiary Roles on the MNC Strategy. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 1(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.21632/